Eppur binaria non é esclusa: Gaia astrometry does NOT disfavor a binary origin for Long Secondary Periods

P. Iwanek¹,Piotr A. Kołaczek-Szymański^1,2, D.M. Skowron¹, G. Pojmański¹, I. Soszyński¹

¹Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland
² Astronomical Institute, University of Wrocław, Mikołaja Kopernika 11, 51-622 Wrocław, Poland

Location of bright LSP stars.

Abstract

We present an independent reassessment of the nearby long secondary period (LSP) stars analyzed by Shariat et al. (2026). By inspecting long-term All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS) light curves, together with Gaia Focused Product Release (Gaia FPR) radial velocity (RV) curves, for 221 LSP candidates (out of 224) located within 1.5 kpc from the Sun, we find that less than half of the sample (103 objects, ∼ 47%) exhibit convincing LSP-like behavior. More than half of the sample could be more naturally interpreted as that of semi-regular variables (SRVs), characterized by irregular or multi- periodic pulsations. This indicates that the analyzed sample is significantly contaminated by non-LSP objects and therefore is not representative of the classical period–luminosity sequence-D population. Using the gaiamock tool to predict Gaia renormalized unit weight error (RUWE) values for binary systems, we show that even the nearest LSP stars do not have to exhibit elevated RUWE values as a consequence of their binarity. We also argue that the binary-nature hypothesis for LSP stars does not lead to a discrepancy between the observed and expected distance–RUWE relation for these variables.